<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Framing current events about the global economic and geopolitical system</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fabiusmaximus.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/framing-events/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fabiusmaximus.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/framing-events/</link>
	<description>A discussion of geopolitics, broadly defined, from an American's perspective.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 04:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fabius Maximus</title>
		<link>http://fabiusmaximus.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/framing-events/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabius Maximus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 01:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fabiusmaximus.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/framing-current-events-about-the-global-economic-and-geopolitical-system/#comment-766</guid>
		<description>Bad news, Max.  Despite what we read in the newspapers, it has been several years since the US attracted sufficient foreign investment in the sense you describe.  We borrow to a large extent from foreign central banks, most of which are of Asian and oil-exporting nations.  They are not buying t-bills at 2% for the wonderful return.  Nor are they buying it for the safe return of principal, as they know they will eventually suffer large foreign exchange losses.

They buy for merchantilist reasons.  They are, in effect, financing our purchase of their exports and obtaining political leverage.  Current leverage, as with the oil exporters.  Future leverage, as with China.  As we all know, in general creditors rule debtors.  Eventually.

So we can restate Max's question -- which is one of the major ones in today's geopolitical world.  When will private investors bail (aka "currency flight")?  Or, when will the political leadership in Asian and oil exporters begin "de-pegging" their currencies from the US Dollar -- which will reduce their buying of US dollar assets?  Nobody knows.

Currency flight by private (as opposed to State) investors is a "herd" event, and hence can start quickly and accellerate rapidly. Central banks are the opposite hind of animal.  They are reactive, incrementalist, slow to decide, and slower to act.  The common doomster analysis of some official in China deciding to hit the "red button" on his desk that sells all their US bonds -- destroying the world financial system -- is unlikely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad news, Max.  Despite what we read in the newspapers, it has been several years since the US attracted sufficient foreign investment in the sense you describe.  We borrow to a large extent from foreign central banks, most of which are of Asian and oil-exporting nations.  They are not buying t-bills at 2% for the wonderful return.  Nor are they buying it for the safe return of principal, as they know they will eventually suffer large foreign exchange losses.</p>
<p>They buy for merchantilist reasons.  They are, in effect, financing our purchase of their exports and obtaining political leverage.  Current leverage, as with the oil exporters.  Future leverage, as with China.  As we all know, in general creditors rule debtors.  Eventually.</p>
<p>So we can restate Max&#8217;s question &#8212; which is one of the major ones in today&#8217;s geopolitical world.  When will private investors bail (aka &#8220;currency flight&#8221;)?  Or, when will the political leadership in Asian and oil exporters begin &#8220;de-pegging&#8221; their currencies from the US Dollar &#8212; which will reduce their buying of US dollar assets?  Nobody knows.</p>
<p>Currency flight by private (as opposed to State) investors is a &#8220;herd&#8221; event, and hence can start quickly and accellerate rapidly. Central banks are the opposite hind of animal.  They are reactive, incrementalist, slow to decide, and slower to act.  The common doomster analysis of some official in China deciding to hit the &#8220;red button&#8221; on his desk that sells all their US bonds &#8212; destroying the world financial system &#8212; is unlikely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://fabiusmaximus.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/framing-events/#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fabiusmaximus.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/framing-current-events-about-the-global-economic-and-geopolitical-system/#comment-760</guid>
		<description>It's interesting that with the US fed rate continuing to drop, and drop some more,  that the US is still able to attract without much apparent diffculty forgien investment to carry this debt.  Lower rates means a low rate of return for forgien investors, and yet although the US currency value has dropped reletive to others,  it still remains apparently an attractive and stable enough investment.

How much lower ? And how much longer ? Is the trillion dollar question,,?  How long before the Fed runs out of capacity in dropping rates as a stimulus to the laging economy, how long before foreign investors look at the rate of return,  and wiegh the risk, then deciede to go elsewhere ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting that with the US fed rate continuing to drop, and drop some more,  that the US is still able to attract without much apparent diffculty forgien investment to carry this debt.  Lower rates means a low rate of return for forgien investors, and yet although the US currency value has dropped reletive to others,  it still remains apparently an attractive and stable enough investment.</p>
<p>How much lower ? And how much longer ? Is the trillion dollar question,,?  How long before the Fed runs out of capacity in dropping rates as a stimulus to the laging economy, how long before foreign investors look at the rate of return,  and wiegh the risk, then deciede to go elsewhere ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Framing Current Events About The Global Economic And Geopolitical System &#171; Defense and the National Interest</title>
		<link>http://fabiusmaximus.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/framing-events/#comment-647</link>
		<dc:creator>Framing Current Events About The Global Economic And Geopolitical System &#171; Defense and the National Interest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fabiusmaximus.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/framing-current-events-about-the-global-economic-and-geopolitical-system/#comment-647</guid>
		<description>[...] If you&#8217;re starting to become concerned about what&#8217;s going on in the financial world, check out Fabius Maximus&#8217;s frame of reference. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you&#8217;re starting to become concerned about what&#8217;s going on in the financial world, check out Fabius Maximus&#8217;s frame of reference. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
